Philomin Raj v. The Superintending Engineer

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by a Commercial Inspector in the respondent Corporation, who was working at Mannachanallur challenging the order of transfer which was accompanied by an order of revocation of suspension order and under the impugned order, the petitioner was transferred from Mannachanallur to South Thuraiyur Section.

¶2According to the learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, this order of transfer has been recalled by the respondent Corporation and the petitioner has now been posted to Srirangam Section and the petitioner has no grievance over his transfer to Srirangam Section.

¶3In view of the above said facts, this writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.

27.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To

1.The Superintending Engineer, TEDC Metro / Trichy (DFC, ADM), Trichy.

2.The Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, Srirangam, Trichy District.

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, Manachanallur,

4.The Senior Administrative Officer / Chief Engineer, Trichy Region,

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

BTR

27.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and W.M.P(MD)Nos.20369 & 21516 of 2023 Philomin Raj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer, TEDC Metro / Trichy (DFC, ADM), Trichy. 2.The Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, Srirangam, Trichy District. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, Manachanallur, 4.The Senior Administrative Officer / Chief Engineer, Trichy Region, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings in Memo No.917/Adm.IV/A. 1/F.Revocation of Suspension/2023, dated 25.09.2023 issued by the first respondent and quash the same on the ground that the same is arbitrary, illegal and without any legal basis and consequently directing the respondents to retain the petitioner back into service for the post of Commercial Inspector in the third respondent Office. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sridharan for Mr.A.Joel Paul Antony For Respondents : M/s.M.Parameshwari Standing Counsel