- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 24236/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 3. Considering the nature of relief to be granted, issuance of notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with.
2.The first respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned appeal on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The first respondent will put the fourth respondent and other interested persons, if any on notice before passing final order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the first respondent to pass order one way or the other. All the contentions of the respective parties are left open.
4.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
06.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer / Appellate Authority, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.
2.The Special Tahsildar, For UDR Scheme, Karaikudi Scale – II,
3.The Tahsildar, Karaiakudi Taluk,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
06.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Palani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer / Appellate Authority, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Special Tahsildar, For UDR Scheme, Karaikudi Scale – II, 3.The Tahsildar, Karaiakudi Taluk, 4.Manikandan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.1 to dispose the Appeal preferred by the Petitioner dated 24.07.2023 under Section 12 of Patta Pass Book Act and cancel the forged Patta Nos.296, 914, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 941 and 942 issued by the Respondents No.2 and 3 for the land situated in Survey No.151/3, 151/3A and 151/3A1 at Vaarivayal village, Karaikudi taluk, For Petitioner : Mr.I.Pinaygash For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.