VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Joseph Premal Jeyakumar v. The District Collector

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 October 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 24323/2023

Judgment

ORDER

Heard both sides.

¶2It is beyond dispute that a borewell was installed on the petitioner's patta land. The borewell has since been removed.

¶3TANGEDCO is directed to disconnect the supply of electricity. This writ petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

17.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The District Collector,

2.The Tahsildar,

3.The Block Development Officer, Rathapuram Panchayat Union,

4.The Assistant Engineer, TWAD Board,

5.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO (Tamilnadu Electricity Board), Kallikulam,

6.The Village Administrative Officer (VAO), Samuga Rengapuram Village,

7.The Panchayat President, Samuga Rengapuram Village,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.20541 of 2023

17.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.20541 of 2023 Joseph Premal Jeyakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, 2.The Tahsildar, 3.The Block Development Officer, Rathapuram Panchayat Union, 4.The Assistant Engineer, TWAD Board, 5.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO (Tamilnadu Electricity Board), Kallikulam, 6.The Village Administrative Officer (VAO), Samuga Rengapuram Village, 7.The Panchayat President, Samuga Rengapuram Village, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.08.2023 to forbear the seventh respondent without due process law to enter into the patta land and to have all the activities in the exists adjacent Government land in S.No.287 instead of petitioner's land exist in S.No.52 situated at Samugarengapuram village, Rathapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Vijayaraja For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate for R.1 to R.4, R.6 & R.7 Mr.S.Dheenadhayalan Standing Counsel for R.5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.