VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Vns Finance v. The Deputy / Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 July 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 26121/2022

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed to quash the impugned assessment order dated

30.09.2022 for the assessment year 2020-2021.

¶2The respondents have filed a counter, wherein it is stated that the petitioner has already preferred statutory appeal before the appellate authority i.e. the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on 31.10.2022 and the same is pending. It is also seen that the petitioner has filed an appeal after filing the present Writ Petition. Since, the statutory appeal is filed before the appellate authority, which is an effective alternative remedy, moreover the petitioner cannot file writ petition for the same cause of action, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

¶3Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

20.07.2023

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To

1.The Deputy / Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 2, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy – 620 015.

2.The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-1, Karur.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr

20.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.20270 and 20273 of 2022 VNS Finance, Represented by its Managing Partner Mr.G.Kuppusamy, S.F.No.2228/A, Ramanujam Nagar South, Near DVN Coach, Andankovil East,Karur – 639 002. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy / Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 2, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy – 620 015. 2.The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-1, Karur. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the first respondent and quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ('Act') in PAN: AAJFV8349Q, DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2022-23/1046135629(1) dated 30.09.2022 for the Assessment Year ('AY') 2020-21. For Petitioner : Mr.N.V.Balaji For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, Standing Counsel.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.