VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Senthil @ Senthilkumar v. The Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 October 2023
Bench
V.Sivagnanamauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 17989/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10/10/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM

¶1Senthil @ Senthilkumar

¶2Mookkaiah @ Mokkaiya

¶3Paalamani@ Balumani

¶4Nanthini ... Petitioners / Accused Nos.2 to 5 Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, Iluppur Police Station Pudukottai District (Crime No.208/2023). ... Respondent / Complainant

For Petitioners : M/s.D.S.Haroon Rasheed Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.M.S.Sethuraman

Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.208/2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A2 to A5, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 498(A),506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.208 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the marriage between the first accused and the defacto complainant was solemnized on 01.12.2018 and at the time of marriage the parents of the defacto complainant offered 25 sovereigns of gold jewels along with srithana articles. After few years of marriage the accused persons harassed the defacto complainant demanding more dowry and harassed her. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and a false case has been foisted against them and they never demanded any dowry. Therefore, he prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that petitioners demanded more dowry and harassed the defacto complainant, hence objected to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that it is matrimonial dispute between the parties, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions:

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ilupur on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties(Common sureties) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioners shall appear before the trial Court on summons [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/-

10/10/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/10/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. AAV To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Iluppur.

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Iluppur Police Station, Pudukottai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17989 of 2023 Date :10/10/2023 ED/DD/SAR- (13/10/2023) 5P / 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.