VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Ganesan P v. The Managing Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 October 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 24537/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by a retired Driver of the respondent Corporation seeking interest for the belated disbursal of his terminal benefits.

¶2A perusal of the affidavit indicates that the petitioner had attained superannuation on 31.08.2018 and he was granted with retirement benefits towards earned leave salary only on 09.01.2023. Hence, he has sent a representation on 01.09.2023 seeking interest for the belated disbursal of the eligible leave salary.

¶3Considering the above said facts, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the writ petitioner, dated 01.09.2023 and pass orders within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶4This Writ Petition stands disposed of on the above said terms. No costs.

10.10.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gbg To The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Bye-Pass Road, Madurai. R. VIJAYAKUMAR

,J.

gbg Dated:

10.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.10.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR P.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Bye-Pass Road, Madurai. ... Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to pay petitioner's terminal benefit towards interest for Eligible Leave Salary, which is delay payment in terminal benefit made by the Respondent on the basis of the petitioner's representation, dated 01.09.2023 within the stipulated time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Mu.Sharavanan For Respondent : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.