Padmanathan L v. The District Collector

O R D E R ************ [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.] After some arguments Ms.V.Sebastinal Preethi, learned Counsel on record sought leave to withdraw the captioned 'Public Interest Litigation' petition [hereinafter 'PIL' for the sake of brevity]. Request acceded to.

2.Learned Counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:

3.Captioned PIL petition is disposed of as closed / withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. [M.S.,J.] & [R.S.V.,J.]

11.10.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No MR To

1.The District Collector, O/o. District Collectorate,

2.The District Superintendent of Police,

3.The District Revenue Officer,

4.The Tahsildhar, Sathoor Taluk,

5.The Inspector of Police, Appaiyya Nayakkan Patti Police Station,

M.SUNDAR, J. and

R.SAKTHIVEL, J. MR

11.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL Padmanathan : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, O/o. District Collectorate, 2.The District Superintendent of Police, 3.The District Revenue Officer, 4.The Tahsildhar, Sathoor Taluk, 5.The Inspector of Police, Appaiyya Nayakkan Patti Police Station, : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 respondents to give permission to celebrate the temple festival separately on 07.10.2023 and 14.10.2023. For Petitioner : Ms.V.Sebastinal Preethi For Respondents 1, 3 & 4 : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate For Respondents 2 & 5 : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor