- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 December 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 21176/2022
Judgment
ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.620 of 2022 on the file of the 1st Respondent Police.
2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.620 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304(A) of IPC.
3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that after completing the investigation final report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul and the same was taken cognizance in P.R.C.No.61 of 2023. Hence, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous.
4.Since the final report has been filed before the concerned Court, the petitioner can workout his remedy through appropriate proceedings, if so aggrieved by the contents of the final report.
5.With the above said liberty, this criminal original petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
05.12.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To
1.The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul, Dindigul District. (Crime No.620 of 2022)
¶2The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN
,J.
TM
05.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21176 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.14839 of 2023 P.Ponnusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul, Dindigul District. (Crime No.620 of 2022) 2.Shahul Hameed ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in FIR relating to Crime No.620 of 2022 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul, Dindigul District and to quash the same as against the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Senthil Kumar For R1 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.