VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Poovarasan v. The Sub Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 October 2023
Bench
V.Sivagnanamauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 18128/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 11/10/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.SIVAGNANAM Poovarasan ... Petitioner/Single Accused Vs State Rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Srirangam, Trichy District. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Balakrishnan.K, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Sureshkumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not Known of 2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / accused apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 417, 420 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.Not known of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had an love affair with the defacto complainant and promised to marry and he had also sexual relationship with the victim. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The leaned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on promising to marry the defacto complainant, the petitioner had sexual intercourse with the victim and subsequently, cheated her. He would further submit that the investigation of the case is pending in CSR.NO.315 of 2023 and hence, he strongly, opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5Considering the serious nature of offence committed by the petitioner and also submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 11/10/2023 / TRUE COPY /

/10/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TRP TO 1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIRANGAM, TRICHY DISTRICT. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.K.BALAKRISHNAN, Advocate ( SR-15141[I] dated 13/10/2023 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.18128 of 2023 Date :11/10/2023 RS/JGB/SAR-(26.10.2023) 3P 4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.