- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 18219/2023
Judgment
O RDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking direction to the 2nd respondent not to interfere the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and not to harass the petitioner and her family members under the guise of enquiry.
2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent herein, now the matter is pending for enquiry. The third respondent has also entered through his counsel and stated that the petitioner is in occupation of property, which belongs to his proposed vendor. Now the petitioner is claiming amount for the purpose vacating the premises.
3.Let the above said complaint be enquired by the respondent police within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner as well as the third respondent shall co-operate with them to complete the process of enquiry. There is no question of harassment.
4.With the above said directions, this criminal original petition stands disposed of.
Speaking : Yes / No
12.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No TM To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.
2.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. TM Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18219 of 2023
12.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18219 of 2023 M.Amutha ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commssioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City. 3.S.Vetrikumar ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and not to harass the petitioner and her family members under the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner :Mr.T.Veerakumar For Respondent :Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar for R1 & R2 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) :Mr.C.Deepak for R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.