Nattudurai v. The Assistant Engineer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for TANGEDCO.

¶2I am more than satisfied that erection of the petition mentioned pole along with overhead lines will not in any way affect the rights of the petitioner. In any event, the first respondent will bear in mind the vehicular movement through pathway in question and install the poles accordingly.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

03.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.21136 of 2023 Nattudurai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Kalimandhyam, Dindugul District. 2.Karuppasamy ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to not to grant permission to 2nd respondent to shift the electricity service from his land in Survey no. 118 to land in Survey no. 114 situated at Appiyapalayam Village, Palappanpatti PO, Oddanchathram Taluk, Dindigul District-624 616., by erecting poles in the corner of the 8 feet width road which is a common pathway. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajeshkumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan for R1