Vijayalakshmi v. The District Collector

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Permission granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is given liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same caution of action after lodging a formal representation before the respondents and after giving them reasonable time to consider the same. No costs.

13.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Director, Department of Most Backward and Denotified Community, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Special Tahsildar, Department of Most Backward and Denotified Community, Ramanathapuram.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

13.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Director, Department of Most Backward and Denotified Community, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Special Tahsildar, Department of Most Backward and Denotified Community, Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to return back an extent of 1 acre 55 cents at Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram comprised in Survey No.100/1 to the petitioner and her family members. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Milton Arul Rajendran For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramni, Spl. Government Pleader.