Manibharathi v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to harass the petitioner and his family members in the guise of enquiry without following the due process of law and to return the original documents to the petitioner.

¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that so far no complaint is received by the second respondent from the third respondent.

¶3It is the allegation of the petitioner that he has been called by the second respondent over phone and threatened.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) further submitted that only before Dindigul West Police Station, the complaint has been given by the third party against the petitioner. So far as the second respondent is concerned, no complaint is received against the petitioner.

¶5The petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition impleading the correct Police Station.

¶6With the above said liberty, this petition is disposed of.

13.10.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : Indu To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

¶2The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

Indu Dated: 13.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.10.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Manibharathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District. 3. Jayapal ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to harass the petitioner and his family members in the guise of enquiry without following the due process of law and to return the original documents to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr. Kamesh N For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side).