VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Correspondent v. The State of Tamil Nadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 November 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 24731/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by an aided minority school challenging the orders passed by the 3rd and 4th respondents herein, wherein the appointment of Physical Education Teacher was not approved.

¶2According to the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, the school is having 1643 girl students and as per the staff fixation order for the academic year 2018-19, the school is entitled to appoint 2 Physical Education Teachers. Since there was only one Physical Education Teacher in the relevant year, another appointment was made on 01.06.2018. When the appointment order was sent for approval to the authorities, the authorities have rejected the same on the ground that there is surplus within the District of Tirunelveli. They have also pointed out the Government letter, dated 04.12.2019, without assigning any reasons whatsoever. Hence, the present writ petition.

¶3A perusal of the staff fixation order of the school indicates that the school is entitled to appoint a Physical Education Teacher in the academic year 2018-19. There is no record to establish that the corporate management is having surplus Physical Education Teacher in the academic year 2018-19. Any surplus Physical Education Teachers in the district would not be relevant for the purpose of considering the approval of appointment of a Physical Education Teacher in a corporate management school. It should only be seen whether there is any surplus Physical Education Teacher within the corporate management.

¶4In view of the above said facts, the orders impugned in the writ petition are set aside. The 3rd respondent is directed to approve the appointment of the writ petitioner with effect from 01.06.2018 with all attendant benefits within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶5With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

28.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gbg To

1.The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-600 009.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

4.The District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli Town, Tirunelveli District. R. VIJAYAKUMAR

,J.

gbg Dated:

28.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and W.M.P(MD)No.20903 of 2023 The Correspondent, Amali Girls Higher Secondary School, Irudayakulam, Vickramasingapuram, Tirunelveli District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-600 009. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 4.The District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli Town, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent CEO in O.Mu.No.8832/a5/2019, dated 30.09.2020 and the consequential proceeding of the 4th respondent DEO in Na.Ka.No. 265/A4/2021, dated 04.05.2021 quash the same, further direct the 3rd respondent Chief Educational Officer herein to approve forthwith the appointment of S.Maria Sabita as Physical Education Teacher in the petitioner's school from the date of her appointment i.e., 01.06.2018 and disburse the grant-in-aid towards her salary and allowance w.e.f the said date. For Petitioner : M/s.A.Amala For Respondents : Mr.V.Om Prakash Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.