- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 24795/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to provide the adequate Police protection for the petitioner's life and limb at all times preferably when the petitioner being available in the his property situated in Survey No.187 on the strength of the petitioner's representation dated on
07.09.2023.
¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that claiming rival title over the property, both the petitioner as well as the third respondent made representation before the second respondent seeking Police Protection and both the above said representations are under enquiry.
¶3The second respondent is directed to summon the petitioner as well as the third respondent for enquiry. Let the above said enquiry be completed within a period of fifteen days from the date of appearance of the parties.
¶4With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
13.10.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No Indu To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.
¶2The Inspector of Police, Oddanchatram Police Station, Dindigul District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J Indu Dated : 13.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.10.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN M.Suresh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Oddanchatram Police Station, Dindigul District. 3. Marimuthu ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to provide the adequate Police protection for the petitioner's life and limb at all times preferably when the petitioner being available in the his property situated in Survey No.187 on the strength of the petitioner's representation dated on 07.09.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.Anand R For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.