- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 24740/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
¶2The petitioner was the president of the second respondent society. He had suffered an order of surcharge under Section 87 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed C.M.A.(CS).No.20 of 2023 before the Co-operative Tribunal / Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi. In the meanwhile, the impugned auction notice has been issued.
¶3The learned counsel for the second respondent points out that when the primary order remains in force, the writ Court will not be justified in entertaining a challenge against the consequential action. Technically, the second respondent's counsel is right. However, the equity obtaining in this case cannot be lost sight of. The appeal filed by the petitioner before the tribunal should be seen as a continuation of the original proceedings. If the properties are auctioned in the mean while, the third party rights would intervene. Let me assume that the petitioner's appeal is allowed. Clock cannot be put back then. It is for this reason, I propose to interfere. The second respondent had incurred some amount towards publication. The petitioner shall pay the same tomorrow itself to the second respondent. It will be a non-refundable payment. The petitioner also agrees to pay a further sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to the second respondent before 10.11.2023. This payment will abide by the outcome of C.M.A.(CS).No.20 of 2023 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi. Since the petitioner has given such an undertaking, the impugned auction sale notice is directed to be put on hold. The Co-operative Tribunal / Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi is directed to dispose of C.M.A.(CS).No.20 of 2023 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner fails to adhere to the undertaking given before this Court, the benefit of this order will stand automatically vacated. The writ petition will be treated as dismissed.
¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
12.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi To
1.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Veerapandiyapattinam, Thiruchendur, Thoothukudi District.
2.The Secretary, D.C.26, Kurumbur Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society, Kurumbur, Eral Taluk, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Sub-Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Field Officer-Alwarthirunagari/Sales Officer, Thoothukudi District.
12.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.20919 & 20920 of 2023 T.Murugesapandian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Veerapandiyapattinam, Thiruchendur, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Secretary, D.C.26, Kurumbur Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society, Kurumbur, Eral Taluk, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Sub-Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Field Officer-Alwarthirunagari/Sales Officer, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in Nima No.1/2022-2023, dated 08.09.2023 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.