- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- V.Sivagnanam
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 18452/2023
Judgment
CRL OP(MD). No.18452 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 13/10/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM CRL OP(MD). No.18452 of 2023 Mohammed Ali @ Bootey ... Petitioner/Accused No.2
Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No.164 of 2023). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Prabhu L,
Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman,
Additional Public Prosecutor PRAYER :- To release the petitioner on Bail in S.C.No.447 of 2023 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court at Thoothukudi, pending investigation. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused, was arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 14.06.2023 for the offence 394 IPC @ Section 394 into Section 395 IPC in Crime No.164 of 2023, charge sheeted in SC.No.447 of 2023 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court at Thoothukudi, seeks bail. CRL OP(MD). No.18452 of 2023
¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 15.05.2023, the petitioner along with other accused robbed 12 sovereign of gold chain from the defacto complainant at the point of aruval. Hence, the case.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody from
14.06.2023 and seeks bail.
¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit the petitioner is having two previous cases in similar nature of offence and he is a habitual offender. Hence, he strongly objected to grant bail to the petitioner.
¶5Considering the serious nature of allegations made against the petitioner and that he is having two previous cases in similar nature of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. CRLeOP(MD).eNo.18452eofe2023
6.oAccordingly,othisoCriminaloOriginaloPetitionoisodismissed.o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooosd/- ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooo13/10/2023 oooo ooooooooooo/oTRUEoCOPYo/ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooo/11/2023 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooSub-AssistantoRegistraro(C.S.ooooo) ooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooMaduraioBenchoofoMadrasoHighoCourt, ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooMaduraio-o625o023.oo trp TO
1.THEoSUPERINTENDENT, oooPALAYAMKOTTAIoJAIL,oTHIRUNELVELI.
2.THEoINSPECTORoOFoPOLICE, ooKOVILPATTIoEASToPOLICEoSTATION,o ooTHOOTHUKUDIoDISTRICT.
3.oTHEoADDITIONALoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR, ooooMADURAIoBENCHoOFoMADRASoHIGHoCOURT,oMADURAI. +1oCCotooM/s.L.PRABHU,oAdvocateo(oSR-15132[I]odatedo13/10/2023o) ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooORDER ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooIN ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooCRLoOP(MD)oNo.18452oofo2023 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooDateoo:13/10/2023 RK/JGBo(07/11/2023)ooo3Po/o5Co MaduraioBenchoofooMadrasoHighoCourtoooisoissuingocertifiedocopiesoinothisoformatofrom 17/07/2023
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.