VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sakunthala v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 November 2023
Bench
P.Vadamalaiauthor
Case no.
CRL MP(MD) 15242/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the First day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.VADAMALAI IN CRL A(MD) No.411 of 2022 SAKUNTHALA ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED No.2

Vs THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SAMAYANALLUR SUBDIVISION, IN SAMAYANALLUR POLICE STATION. (CRIME NO.19 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honble Court by its order dated 09.11.2022 in Crl.M.P.

(MD)No.13491/2022 in Crl.A.(M).No.411/2022 on the file of this Hon'ble Court. Prayer in CRL.A.(MD)No.411 of 2022: To call for the records in S.C.No.43 of 2016 on the file of Learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Madurai, and set aside the order of conviction and sentence dated 14.06.2022. Order : This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.S.SRIKANTH, Advocate for M/S.APN LAW ASSOCIATES, for the petitioner and of Mr.K.SANJAY GANDHI, Government Advocate on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:- This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P(MD).No.13491 of 2022 in Crl.A(MD)No.411 of 2022 dated 09.11.2022.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Sanjay Gandhi, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police are present before this Court.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court regularly.

¶4The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and also submitted that the investigation is going on.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the condition imposed by this court in Crl.M.P(MD).No.13491 of 2022 in Crl.A(MD)No.411 of 2022 dated

09.11.2022 is modified and the petitioner shall report before the concerned trial Court once in three months (i.e) on first working day of January, April, July, October at

10.30 a .m., until further orders.

sd/-

01/11/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/11/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. TTA TO 1 THE SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT, MADURAI. 2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI. 3 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SAMAYANALLUR SUBDIVISION, IN SAMAYANALLUR POLICE STATION. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN IN CRL A(MD) No.411 of 2022 Date :01/11/2023 SA/JGB/SAR. /06.11.2023/3P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.