- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 24905/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to take further action upon the petitioner's complaint in C.S.R.No.94 of 2023, dated 27.02.2023.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who appearing for the State.
3.The grievance of the petitioner is that C.S.R.No.94 of 2023 was not properly enquired. Without proper enquiry, it was closed. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, both parties appeared and the private respondents gave statement that they will workout their remedy through appropriate civil process. On that ground it was closed.
4.It appears that there was oral sale agreement between the parties. Pursuant to that agreement, some money and jewels have been given to the vendor. It is purely civil dispute. The parties have to workout their remedy only before the civil forum. This Court cannot grant any relief at this stage.
5.With the above said liberty, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.
16.10.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No TM To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur Sub Division, Madurai District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J TM Dated : 16.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.10.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN R.Arunachalam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur Sub Division, Madurai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direct the 3rd respondent to take further action upon the petitioner's complaint in C.S.R.No.94 of 2023, dated 27.02.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vinoth Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.