VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

C.Jain Kumar v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 November 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 24851/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard both sides.

2.The case of the petitioner is that the petition mentioned property is the subject matter of a partition suit. It is stated that preliminary decree has already been passed and that the petition mentioned site has been allotted as the petitioner's share by the advocate commissioner.

3.The respondents 5 and 6 state that on the land allotted to the petitioner, no construction is being put up.

4.I make it clear that the rights of the parties will abide by the outcome of the final decree proceedings. The respondents 5 and 6 cannot claim any equity based on any construction.

5.With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous is closed.

20.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil.

2.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Nagercoil,

3.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvattar Block,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

4.The President, Yettacode Village Panchayat,

20.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.21049 of 2023 C.Jain Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil. 2.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Nagercoil, 3.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvattar Block, 4.The President, Yettacode Village Panchayat, 5.Justin Santhakumar 6.Jeyakumari ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.09.2023 and cancel the building plan permission granted infavour of respondent 5 and 6 to construct the house in the property owned by the petitioner in re-survey No.340/8B of Yettacode Village, Kalkulam Taluk. For Petitioner : Ms.D.Saranya For Respondents : Mr.K.Balsubramani, Spl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2. Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar, Government Advocate for R3 & R4. Mr.G.Cenil for R5. Mr.G.Ramanathan for R6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.