- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 24894/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
¶2The learned Central Government Standing Counsel informs the Court that two cases are pending against the writ petitioner. One of them has already been charge sheeted and it is pending at committal stage in P.R.C.No.9 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirukostiyur. The petitioner is permitted to file file a Miscellaneous Petition seeking the relief now sought for in this writ petition. This petition shall be disposed of by the learned Committal Magistrate on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three weeks after such filing.
¶3With this liberty to the petitioner to move the Committal Magistrate and direction to the Committal Magistrate to dispose of, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
16.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA Note: Registry is directed to mark the copy of this order to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirukostiyur. To The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 004.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
16.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Prakash Nethaji ... Petitioner Vs. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 004. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to issue/renew the Passport of the petitioner vide No. L0070261, dated 17.04.2023 as applied by him vide Application dated 01.06.2023 vide file No. MD1075426104723. For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan For Respondent : Mr.P.Paul Pandi Central Government Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.