- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 25069/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The third respondent is directed to dispose of the petitioner's complaint and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into merits of the matter. It is open to the third respondent to pass order one way or other. Interested parties shall be put on notice.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
16.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.
4.The Tahsildar, Palani, Dindigul District.
5.The Sub Registrar, Registration Department, Palani, Dindigul District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
16.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.21262 & 21263 of 2023 S.Indhurani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District. 4.The Tahsildar, Palani, Dindigul District. 5.The Sub Registrar, Registration Department, Palani, Dindigul District. 6.Murugeswari ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take appropriate action on the basis of the complaint made by the petitioner dated 25.07.2021 as acknowledged by the 2nd respondent through proceedings dated 08.11.2021 in Na.Ka.No.60/2021/A6 and the 3rd respondent dated 08.01.2022 in Na.Ka.No.3/2021/A1 in accordance with law for restoration of patta in the name of the petitioner pertaining to the properties comprised in Plot No.13 and 14 in Doc.No.456/99 and 744/99 of Sivagiripatti village, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District, within a time limit as fixed by this court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Aravindan For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.