VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Saratha v. The Commissioner of Land Administration

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 October 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 25359/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that survey documents had been sought for from the writ petitioner. As and when the writ petitioner furnishes the same, appropriate order on merits shall be passed. The details sought for by the respondents is set out in the Letter bearing Na.Ka.No.5674/2023/M8 dated 11.07.2023. Copy of the said communication has now been handed over to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. It is for the writ petitioner to make available the document in question. Enquiry shall be held on

07.11.2023 at 03.00 p.m. The fifth respondent is directed to pass final within a period of two months thereafter. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the fifth respondent to pass order one way or the other. The fifth respondent shall put on notice to all the interested persons before passing final order.

¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

19.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

2.The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukkottai.

3.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Pudukkottai.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.

5.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.

19.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Saratha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukkottai. 3.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Pudukkottai. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District. 5.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take appropriate steps to change the wrong classification from Government Porampoke to Punjai SF No.26/1D with an extent of 148.88 Acre of Settikadu Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District and grant patta to the petitioner with sub division in the light of the petitioner's registered sale deed dated 09.07.1997 bearing Document No.1658 in SF No.26/1D with an extent of 2 Acre 45 cent of Settikadu Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 26.07.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Paranjothi For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.