- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 18551/2023
Judgment
O RDER
Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry in false information given by the respondent.
¶2Now the grievance of the petitioner is that even though it was reported before this Court while hearing the case in Crl.O.P(MD) No.6604 of 2019 that the case in crime No.4 of 2019 was closed after investigation, the third complaint is given by the private respondent stating that continuous trouble is made by the petitioner.
¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the above said complaint was given by the third respondent before the Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, it has been forwarded to the second respondent.
¶4Let the petitioner appear before the second respondent and produce the above said closure report's copy of Crime No.4 of 2019. The second respondent may close the above said complaint given by the third repsondent.
¶5With the above said direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
16.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Indu To
1.The State Rep. by, The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18551 of 2023
16.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18551 of 2023 Karuppaiah ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The State Rep. by, The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. 3.Basarullah ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry in false information given by the respondent. For Petitioner :Mr.R.Karunanidhi For Respondent :Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.