- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 25063/2023
Judgment
ORDER
Heard both sides.
¶2The case involves claiming of the crop insurance amount. It appears that the petitioner's case has been recommended by the second respondent. File is with the first respondent. The first respondent is directed to dispose of the petitioner's claim on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
02.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To
1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Tahsildar, R.A.Mangalam Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Joint Director of Agricultural, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
02.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Meenambal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Tahsildar, R.A.Mangalam Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Joint Director of Agricultural, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider tna pay the agricultural drought insurance amount for a period of 2018-2019 based on the petitioner's representation dated 22.05.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Velavadhas For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.