S.Sathan v. The Tahsildar

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The impugned order has no legal consequence as such. It is only a peace committee meeting. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent, the first respondent has merely called upon the parties to abide by the terms of the order dated

27.07.2023 made in W.P(MD)Nos.28048 of 2022 and 7678 of 2023. It appears that the petitioner herein has filed Writ Appeal against the said order. If that be so, the rights of the parties will abide by the outcome of the order to be passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench. There is no need to interfere with the impugned order for the present. In any event, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent has clarified that the petitioner can very well participate in the function like any other devotee.

¶3Recording the said submission of the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent, this writ petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)Nos.21242 & 21244 of 2023

16.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.21242 & 21244 of 2023 S.Sathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District. 2.K.S.Selvaraj Servai ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned Peace Committee Meeting resolution in Na.Ka.A5/139/2023 dated 06.10.2023 passed by the first respondent herein, quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Anandan For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate for R.1 Mr.R.Paranjothi for M/s.KBS Law Office for R.2