- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 25108/2023
Judgment
ORDER
Heard both sides.
¶2A representative suit was filed in O.S.No.6 of 1996 on the the file of District Munsif Court, Kamuthi and decree dated 31.01.2006 was passed. The decree reads as follows: DECREE
¶1that the plaintiffs are entitled for declaration that Kalliikulam tank is entitled uninterrupted supply of water through the supply channel called Kallikulam channel without any diversion of whole flow.
2.consequentially the defendants 1 to 4 are restrained from interfering the supply of water to Kallikulam tank by removing the bund surplus weir construction shutter at 'B' point in the plaint sketch.
3.that the plaintiffs are granted mandatory injunction directing the defendants to restore the bund and surplus weir shutters constructed 2 feet and 9 inches at 'B' point in the plan within three months from the date of Judgement. The said decree has become final.
¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that the weir constructed by the villagers of T.Kallikulam is now sought to be demolished without notice.
¶4When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the permanent construction that has been made is not contemplated or envisaged by the civil Court's decree.
¶5After carefully going through the contents of the decree, I am satisfied that the direction has been given to the authorities for restoration of the earlier position. Villagers of T.Kallikulam have not been given permission to put up any construction. Therefore, the proposed demolition cannot be faulted. But even while demolishing the weir put up by the villagers of T.Kallikulam, it is the duty of the respondents to immediately replace it by a surplus weir shutter as decreed in O.S.No.6 of 1996 on the file of District Munsif Court, Kamuthi.
¶6With this liberty and direction to the respondents, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
13.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To
1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector,
2.The Executive Officer, Public Works Department (Water Resources Organisation), Kundaru Water Basin Division, Madurai District.
3.The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department (Water Resources Organisation), Kundaru Water Basin Division, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District.
4.The Tahsildar, Office of the Kamuthi Taluk Office,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)Nos.21291 & 21292 of 2023
13.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.21291 & 21292 of 2023 Irulandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, 2.The Executive Officer, Public Works Department (Water Resources Organisation), Kundaru Water Basin Division, Madurai District. 3.The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department (Water Resources Organisation), Kundaru Water Basin Division, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Tahsildar, Office of the Kamuthi Taluk Office, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide his proceedings in 337M/E.Va.Aa2/Ko.25/2023 dated 06.10.2023 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For Respondent : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.