Pachayappa High School v. The Chief Educational Officer

O R D E R The present writ petition has been filed by the Aided Non-Minority School challenging the order passed by the first respondent herein for rejecting the approval of appointment of Record Clerk in the School.

¶2The petitioner Management has appointed one Chandrasekara Saraswathyraja, as Record Clerk on 15.02.2018 and the proposal was forwarded by the School to the first respondent for granting approval. The first respondent has rejected the approval on the following grounds:

(i) The School Committee of the petitioner's School has not passed any resolution or has not obtained prior permission from the Education Department;

(ii) There is a discrepancy between the date on which the interview was conducted and the signature of the Headmaster in the selection report;

(iii) The appointment order does not reflect the person to whom it is addressed;

(iv) The appointment order has been issued post-dated ; and

(v) The vacancy was prevailing for more than eight years and suddenly, steps have been taken to fill up the said post. Challenging the said order, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶3After filing the writ petition, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents was directed to verify with regard to the discrepancy between the date of interview and the signature of the Headmaster in the selection list. After verification, it has been found to be an inadvertent mistake. The other reasons assigned in the impugned order are frivolous in nature except the reason that no prior permission has been obtained from the authorities before the appointment.

¶4The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court reported in 2021(6) CTC 594 (the Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai and two others Vs. S.Murugan) has categorically held that for filling up the post of sanctioned non-teaching post, there are no rules to seek prior permission from the educational authorities. In view of the Division Bench order, this Court is of the view that all the reasons assigned in the impugned order for rejecting the said request are not sustainable in law.

¶5In view of the above said facts, the first respondent herein is directed to approve the appointment of one Chandrasekara Saraswathyraja as Record Clerk in the petitioner's School with effect from 15.02.2018 with all attendant benefits within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

30.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To

¶1The Chief Educational Officer, Theni District.

¶2The District Educational Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi W.P(MD)No.25100 of 2023

30.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P(MD)No.25100 of 2023 Pachayappa High School, Represented by its Secretary, P.G.Lakshmivasan Uppukottai, Bodihayakkanur Taluk, Theni District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Chief Educational Officer, Theni District. 2. The District Educational Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating with the order of the first respondent made in Na.Ka.No. 3973-A1-2023, dated 14.09.2023 and quash the same as it is arbitrary and illegal and in consequence to direct him/her to approve forthwith, the appointment of one Chandrasekara Saraswathyraja, as Record Clerk in the petitioner School, with effect from 15.02.2018, with all attendant benefits including the arrears of salary and allowance. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.V.Om Prakash Government Advocate