- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 December 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26158/2023
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The relief sought for in the present Writ Petition is to direct the respondents 6 to 8 to take action against the 9th respondent for the removal of the unauthorized construction of building in violation of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Building Rules, based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.08.2023.
2.With reference to the allegation set out in the Writ proceedings, we have directed the learned Special Government Pleader to furnish the files relating to the building plan permission granted by the competent authority. Pursuant to the same, he has submitted the files, which would reveal that planning permission was granted by the 8th respondent on 09.03.2023. Since the building plan permission has been granted under the rules, the petitioner has not made out any ground to grant the relief sought for herein. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. However, if any violations are noticed, it is for the authorities to initiate action in the manner known to law. No costs.
(S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)
14.12.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Yuva To
1.The Principal Secretary, Local Administration Department, Secretariat Office, Chennai-600 009.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Yuva
2.The Director of Municipal Administration, Chennai.
3.The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Tirunelveli.
4.The Director, Town & Country Planning, Chennai.
5.The Assistant Director, Town & Country Planning, Virudhunagar.
6.The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.
7.The Block Development Officer, Virudhunagar Union Office, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
14.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.Surendran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary, Local Administration Department, Secretariat Office, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director of Municipal Administration, Chennai. 3.The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Tirunelveli. 4.The Director, Town & Country Planning, Chennai. 5.The Assistant Director, Town & Country Planning, Virudhunagar. 6.The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 7.The Block Development Officer, Virudhunagar Union Office, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 8.The President / Presiding Officer, Chathirareddypatti Panchayat, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 9.Pappureddy ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 6 to 8 to take action against the 9th respondent for the removal of impugned construction of building for violating the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Building Rules, based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mariappan For R1 to R7 : Mr.M.Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.