- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 25153/2023
Judgment
O R D E R Heard both sides.
¶2The petitioner challenges the impugned order dated
11.07.2023 passed by the District Revenue Officer,
The
District
Revenue
Officer, Ramanathapuram had negatived the revision filed by the writ petitioner herein.
¶3Too many facts are involved. The petitioner is relying on some ancient documents. The contesting respondents are relying on the settlement pattas issued in in their favour. These aspects will have to be necessarily considered only by the jurisdictional civil Court. The writ Court is not a proper forum. Granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the 4 W.P.(MD)NO.25153 OF 2023 jurisdictional civil Court for establishing her rights, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
22.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To:
¶1The District Revenue Officer-cum-Additional District Magistrate,
¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.the Revenue Divisional Officer, 5 W.P.(MD)NO.25153 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.25153 of 2023
22.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
1 W.P.(MD)NO.25153 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.25153 of 2023 AND W.M.P.(MD)No.21375 of 2023 Jayalakshmi Ammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Revenue Officer-cum- Additional District Magistrate, 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.the Revenue Divisional Officer, 3. Veerayogam 4. Jamuna 5. Ayyappan 6. Gopi 7. Mohamed Yusuf 8. G.Muniasamy 9. Ramamurthy 10.Balakrishnan 11.Neelamegam 2 W.P.(MD)NO.25153 OF 2023 12.C.Muniasamy 13. Sengamalam 14. Chokkalingam 15. Niranjan 16. Ravindran 17. Chinna Pillai 18. Malaiyittal 19. Karpagam 20. Gomathi 21. Sekar 22. Kalyani 23. Malaichamy 24. Ponniah 25. Danushkodi 26. Periya Karuppan 27. Umarani 28. A.Mohamed Yusuf ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by 1st respondent in Ni.Mu.(P6)/18796/2016 dated 11.07.2023 quash the same and consequently direct the 3 W.P.(MD)NO.25153 OF 2023 2nd respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Padma Raj For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.M.Sidharthan, Additional Government Pleader. For R-19 & R-20 : Mr.P.Vadivel * * *
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.