R.M.Arivoli v. Punniya Arasu,

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2From the materials made available, I am satisfied that survey was done on 29.01.2023. Copies of the survey sketch and other materials have been served on the learned counsel for the petitioner. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, it is open to the petitioner to take such measures as advised.

¶3The contempt petition is closed.

15.11.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi To

1.The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi in W.P.(MD)No.26661 of 2022

15.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in W.P.(MD)No.26661 of 2022 R.M.Arivoli ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Punniya Arasu The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 2.N.Senthil Kumar The Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent herein for willfully failing to comply with the order of this Court dated 25.11.2022 passed by this court in W.P.(MD)No.26661 of 2022 on the file of this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader