Ramachandran v. The Commissioner of Police

O RDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry in pursuance of the complaint given by the 4th respondent to the 3rd respondent.

¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that it is a issue between the borewell contractor and owner of the property. Because of the failure to put up the borewell infront of the petitioner's house, trouble arose between the parties, over which, this petitioner gave a complaint against the private respondent. It was enquired in C.No.69 of 2023. During the course of enquiry, both sides appeared and gave statement that they will workout their remedy through the civil process. After the above said undertaking, the petitioner filed a petition before the Consumer Forum.

¶3In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advcoate (Crl.Side), nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this matter. Hence, this matter has become infructuous.

¶4In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Speaking : Yes / No

19.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Indu G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu To

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, South Gate Range, Madurai City.

3.The Inspector of Police, South Gate Police Station, Madurai City.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18800 of 2023

19.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18800 of 2023 Ramachandran ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, South Gate Range, Madurai City. 3.The Inspector of Police (Law & Order), South Gate Police Station, Madurai City. 4.Kannan ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry in pursuance of the complaint of the 4th respondent on the file of the 3rd respondent. For Petitioner :Mr.K.Manavalan For R1 to R3 :Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side). For R4 :Mr.R.Thangapandian