VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

V.Sankarappa Naicker v. S.Rajahussian,

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 January 2023
Bench
G. Jayachandran, S Justice S.Srimathy
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 1832/2022

Judgment

O R D E R ******** DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J S.SRIMATHY,J The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Contemnors/Respondents 3 and 6 produced photographs and proceedings of the Revenue Tahsildar, Vembakottai, Virudhunagar District and submitted that the encroachment made by Subbuthai, wife of Subramanian, the fifth respondent in the Writ Petition to an extent of 0.00.11 sq.mtr of land been removed in toto on

06.01.2023.

3.Recording the same, the Contempt Petition is closed. No costs. [G.J.,J.] [S.S.Y.,J.]

30.01.2023 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No vsn To

1.S.Raja Hussain The Tahsildar, Vembakottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

2.Sathiyamoorthi, The Block Development Officer, Vembakottai Union, Virudhunagar District.

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. S.SRIMATHY,J. vsn 0RDER MADE IN CONT.P(MD)NO.1832 OF 2022 in W.P(MD)No.21982 of 2021

30.01.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30.01.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CONT.P(MD)NO.1832 OF 2022 in W.P(MD)No.21982 of 2021 V.Sankarappa Naicker :Petitioner/Petitioner .vs. 1.S.Raja Hussain The Tahsildar, Vembakottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 2.Sathiyamoorthi, The Block Development Officer, Vembakottai Union, Virudhunagar District. :Contemnor/Respondent No. 3 and 6 PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying this Court to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court made in W.P(MD)No.21982 of 2021, dated 13.06.2021. For Petitioner :Mr.V.Sankarappa Naicker Party-in-person (No appearance) For Respondents :Mr.D.Sasikumar Addl.Govt.Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.