- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 25536/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
2.The petitioner's daughter is studying in the third respondent school. Since the child was subjected to corporal punishment, the present writ petition came to be filed.
3.After hearing the learned counsel on either side and also going through the materials on record, I am satisfied that a small issue has been blown out of proportion. I would request the fourth respondent not to take anything personally. The learned counsel for the fourth respondent assures the Court that the fourth respondent has the best interest of the child at heart and no other consideration.
4.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
20.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The Chief Educational officer,
2.The District Educational officer, Thanjavur – 613 001.
3.The Head Master, Arulneri High School, Ammanpettai, Thanjavur – 613 205.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
4.The Inspector of Police, Naduvaveri Police Station, Nadukaveri,
20.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.21722 of 2023 K.Maria Stella Jayaseeli ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Educational officer, 2.The District Educational officer, Thanjavur – 613 001. 3.The Head Master, Arulneri High School, Ammanpettai, Thanjavur – 613 205. 4.S.Vijayakumar 5.Sabarinathan 6.The Inspector of Police, Nadukaveri Police Station, Nadukaveri, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1, 2 and 6 to take suitable action in accordance with law against the Respondents 3 to 5 based upon the complaint preferred by the Petitioner regarding the corporal punishment given to the Petitioner's daughter namely K.Kayalvizhi, VII-B in the 3rd respondent school and intimidation thereafter. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate for R1 to R3. Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate for R6. Mr.M.Karunanidhi for R4.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.