Chinnamaruthu v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader submitted that survey had already been conducted and the matter had become infructuous.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent reiterated that she has no claim on the writ petitioner's property which is comprised in Survey No.5/5A.

¶4Recording the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

19.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Assistant Director of Survey, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Tahsildar, Kallikudi Taluk,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

4.The Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Kallikudi, Copy to: The District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam. and W.M.P(MD)No.21531 of 2023

19.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.21531 of 2023 Chinnamaruthu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Assistant Director of Survey, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Tahsildar, Kallikudi Taluk, 4.The Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Kallikudi, 5.R.Tamilselvi ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 not to conduct survey and demarcate the property comprised in Old No.330/5, UDR S. No.5/5A, Kurayur 2nd Bit Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District, pending final disposal of the civil suit in O.S.No.165/2018 on the file of District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Aravindan For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate for R.4 Mr.P.Mahendran for R.5