- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26573/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The first respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into merits of the matter. It is open to the first respondent to pass order one way or other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
06.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The Tahsildar, O/o Ramanathapuram Taluk Office, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Deputy Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram Taluk Office Kuyavankudi Group, Ramanathapuram District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
06.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Devi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, O/o Ramanathapuram Taluk Office, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Deputy Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram Taluk Office Kuyavankudi Group, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st Respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.07.2023 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sudarkodinachiar For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.