Pitchammal v. The District Collector

O R D E R Heard both sides.

2.On the ground that the petitioner's husband was engaged in unauthorized Allopathy practice in the petition mentioned premises, the building was sealed.

3.Seeking its desealing, the present writ petition came to be filed. I wanted the petitioner as well as her husband to file an appropriate affidavit before this Court undertaking that they will not engage in such illegal practice. Admittedly, the petitioner's husband is not a qualified Allopathy Doctor. Therefore, he cannot engage himself in Allopathy practice.

4.Since an undertaking has been given by the petitioner as well as her husband, the respondents are directed to de-seal the premises immediately.

5.The Writ Petition is allowed, accordingly. No costs.

05.12.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No mm Note : Issue order copy on 07.12.2023 To

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Dindigul District.

2.The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk Office, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. mm W.P.(MD)No.25652 of 2023

05.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.25652 of 2023 Pitchammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Dindigul District. 2.The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk Office, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.09.2023 to de-seal the portion of the petitioner's shop and residential house which was sealed by the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arjun For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader