VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Sathees v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 December 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 18971/2023

Judgment

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the impugned Summons dated 16.10.2023 issued by the second respondent under sections 160 and 91 Cr.P.C in the nature.

¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that in pursuance of the order, passed by this Court, dated 20.10.2023, the petitioner appeared before the respondent Police and give statement on

04.11.2023 that he will not indulge in similar kind of activities in future.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would further submit that recording the above statement of the petitioner, finding that there is no criminal case pending against the petitioner, they will going to close the enquiry.

¶4Recording the submissions made by the learned Government advocate (Crl.Side), the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

07.12.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Indu To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Uthumalai Police Station, Tenkasi District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18971 of 2023

07.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18971 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No.14980 of 2023 M.Sathees ... Petitioner/Accused Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Uthumalai Police Station, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents/Investigating Officer PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to quash the impugned Summons dated 16.10.2023 issued by the second respondent under sections 160 and 91 Cr.P.C in the nature. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajamohan For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.