Madhavan.A v. The District Revenue Officer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing final order.

¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

19.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul.

3.The Tahsildar, Natham, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

19.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Madhavan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul. 3.The Tahsildar, Natham, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to revise the FMB sketch with regard to Survey No. 377/9B, Sendurai Village, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District, make sub division and issue patta to an extent of 1320 sq.ft., belongs to the petitioner based on the representation dated 20.06.2023 within time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.V.P.Rajan For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader