- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 25588/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the first respondent.
2.The first respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned revision petition on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The first respondent shall put the interested persons, if any, including the second respondent on notice before passing final order. It is open to the first respondent to pass order one way or the other.
3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
20.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- The District Revenue Officer, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
20.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN R.Muthusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. 2.Thangarasu ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose the Revision Petition No.25 of 2022 filed challenging the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer in Tha.Pa.No.5/2022/A5 thereby refused to make corrections in the joint patta relating to Nanchikottai Village, Punjai Survey No.55/3 in Thanjavur District. For Petitioner : Mr.Karunanithi For Respondents : Mr.M.Sidharthan, Addl. Government Pleader for R1.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.