- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26052/2023
Judgment
ORDER The writ petitioner is an aspirant to the post of Town Planning Inspector in the respondent Municipality. As per the allegations in the affidavit, without following the due process of law, appointments are attempted to be made for the post of Town Planning Inspector. It is needless to point out that the respondent Municipality should strictly follow the Tamil Nadu Municipal Town Planning Service Rules, 1970 especially Rule 5(2) in appointing a Town Planning Inspector.
¶2With the above said observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
01.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To The Commissioner, Sivagangai Municipality, Sivagangai District.
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
BTR
01.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Logeshkumar ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Sivagangai Municipality, Sivagangai District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to follow the appointment Rules to the post of Town Planning Inspector in the respondent Municipality in transparent manner by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 11.10.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajagopalan For Respondent : Mr.A.Kathiravan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.