Dharmaraj.N v. The Inspector General of Registration

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 3.

2.The petitioner has given a representation before the second respondent for cancelling the petition mentioned document. The petitioner invokes Section 77-A of the Registration Act, 1908. The second respondent is directed to keep the petitioner's complaint on his file. He shall take a call based on the decision to be rendered by the Hon'ble Larger Bench.

3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

30.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.The Inspector General of Registrations, Registration Office, 100, santhome High Road, Chennai – 28.

2.The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Trichy District.

3.The Sub-Registrar, Musiri Sub-Registrar Office, Musiri, Trichy District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

30.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN N.Dharmaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registrations, Registration Office, 100, santhome High Road, Chennai – 28. 2.The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Trichy District. 3.The Sub-Registrar, Musiri Sub-Registrar Office, Musiri, Trichy District. 4.R.Rajendran 5.Sundaravel ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to cancel the forged sale deed No.4494/2022 dated 20.09.2022 on the file of 3rd respondent office on the basis of petitioner representation dated 28.04.2023 within a stipulated period of time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Goukl For Respondents : Mr.M.Sidharthan, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3.