- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 25814/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the final order.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
20.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.
2.The Tahsildar, Tirupattur Taluk, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
20.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN R.Sasikala ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Tahsildar, Tirupattur Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider and pass orders on her representation dated 22.09.2023 seeking to mutate the patta in respect of the petitioner's land in Survey no. 39/5, 396/, 39/7 and 39/16 in Thiruvyidiyarpatti Village, Tirupattur Taluk, Sivagangai District within a time that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.