Zeenath Begum v. The the District Revenue Officer

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.All that the petitioner seeks is consideration of the petition mentioned representation. He wants some error to be rectified which had occurred during UDR survey in respect of the petition mentioned land. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the second respondent had already conducted an enquiry in this regard and forwarded report to the first respondent. It is for the first respondent to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.

3.This writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

01.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The District Revenue Officer, District Collector Office, Collectorate Complex, Dindigul.

2.The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

01.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Zeenath Begam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, District Collector Office, Collectorate Complex, Dindigul. 2.The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to rectify the mistake committed during the UDR Survey in respect of the patta for the landed properties situated in Dindigul District, Natham Taluk, Sirangattupatti Village, Re-Survey No.84/2, S.F.No.84/3 B, S.F.No.84/4 and SF.No.80/1, by considering the representation of the petitioner's mother late Ummu Kolthu Beevi dt 18.06.2019, with in a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Sivaram For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate