- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 July 2023
- Bench
- S Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 1/2020
Judgment
ORDER Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the dispute was resolved out of the Court and hence, this petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
17.07.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Ns To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli.
2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Ns and C.M.P(MD)No.2 of 2020
17.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI and C.M.P(MD)No.2 of 2020 K.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs. C.Jeyakumar ... Respondent/Respondent/ Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to strike off the E.P.No.224 of 2019 on Crl.R.C.NO.403 of 2017 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli and allow the above civil revision petition. For Petitioner :Mr.N.Mohan For Respondent :Mr.S.S.Vinod Sathya Lazar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.