VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Preethi v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 19808/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to interfere the peaceful life of the petitioner and her child Diya and not to harass the petitioner without any order from the appropriate Court as Guardians by the 3 to 5 respondents and direct the 3 to 5 respondents to approach the concerned court to claim the child.

¶2Learned Government Advocate submitted that it is a matrimonial issue between the petitioner and the third respondent. On the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, the matter was settled between the parties. Over the custody of the child, the parties were advised to approach the concerned court through appropriate civil proceedings.

¶3In view of the above submission, nothing survives for further adjudication. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

07.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : pnn To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, All women Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

pnn

07.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Preethi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, All women Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District. 3.Partheeban 4.Gowthaman 5.Manimegalai ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to interfere the peaceful life of the petitioner and her child Diya and not to harass the petitioner without any order getting from the appropriate Court as Guardians by the 3 to 5 respondents and direct the 3 to 5 respondents to approach the court to claim the child in the interest of justice. For Petitioner : Mr.J. Balameenakshi For R1 & R2 : Mr. M. Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.