- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 11271/2017
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that his representation dated 27.12.2016, which was submitted under Section 10 of the Patta Pass Book Act has not been considered by the respondents.
2.The
learned
Government
Advocate
on instructions submits that the Revenue Inspector has conducted an enquiry on 14.12.2023 and he has sent a proposal to the Tahsildar.
3.In view of the above, 1st respondent Tahsildar is directed to pass suitable orders in the petitioner's application within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on merits and in accordance with law, after providing necessary opportunities to all the interested parties, if any.
4.This writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs.
08.06.2023 Internet : Yes / No To The Tahsildar, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
08.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 08.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI T.Lourdusamy ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. 2.Xavier 3.Joseph Selvaraj 4.Johnraj ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2016 and rectify the erroneous entries in Natham Patta for S.Nos.253/17B1W and 253/17B1U Malaiyadipatti, Manjampatti via, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. For Petitioner : Mr.Raguvarangoplan For Respondent : Mr.PT.Thiraviam No.1 Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.