VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

G.K.Alagu, v. The Chief Education Officer

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 June 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 11361/2017

Judgment

ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement so.

2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

08.06.2023 Internet : Yes / No To

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tallakulam, Madurai.

2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

3.The Correspondent, Alagappa Girls Matric School, Alagappapuram, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

4.The Corespondent, Alagappa Preparatory Nurservy and Primary School, Alagappapuram, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

08.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 08.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.8744 of 2017 G.K.Alagu ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tallakulam, Madurai. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 3.The Correspondent, Alagappa Girls Matric School, Alagappapuram, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 4.The Corespondent, Alagappa Preparatory Nurservy and Primary School, Alagappapuram, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 5.Umayal Ramanathan, Secretary, Dr.Alagappa Chettiar Educational Trust, Purasaiwalkam, Chennai – 600 084. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to initiate appropriate proceedings against the respondents 3 to 5 to permit the petitioner's daughters to continue in the 3rd and 4th respondents school in their respective classes under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act and in the event of any necessity of making payment towards fees and in such event direct the respondents 3 and 4 to collect the fees fixed by private schools fee determination committee. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sekar For Respondent : Mr.M.Sarangam, Nos.1 & 2 Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram No.5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.