VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Jeyaraman, v. Chief Information Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 June 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 11442/2017

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner's appeal dated 24.03.2017 within the time stipulated by this Court.

2.The learned Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that the petitioner's appeal dated 24.03.2017 had already been disposed of by the 1st respondent.

3.Recording the above submission of the learned Counsel for the 1st respondent this writ petition is closed. No costs.

08.06.2023 dsk To

1.The Chief Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Kamadhenu Super Market - I Floor, Old NO.273, New No.378, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai - 18.

2.The Appellate Authority to the Public Information Officer, Office of the Tahsildar, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

3.The Public Information Officer, Office of the Tahsildar, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

08.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Jeyaraman ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Chief Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Kamadhenu Super Market - I Floor, Old NO.273, New No.378, Anna Salai,Teynampet, Chennai - 18. 2.The Appellate Authority to the Public Information Officer, Office of the Tahsildar, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3.The Public Information Officer, Office of the Tahsildar, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to provide the required information as requested in Appeal filed by the petitioner dated 24.03.2017 and also to take necessary action against the erring officials as per the provision under Section 19 and 20 of the Right to Information Act. For petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan For Respondent : Mr.K.K.Senthil No.1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.