- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30469/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2.The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation dated 28.12.2020 and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The second respondent will put on notice all the interested parties before passing final order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other.
3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
20.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To
1.The District Collector, Madurai District.
2.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
20.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Amma Pillai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issue patta in the petitioner name in respect of the property comprised in New Sur.No.104/8 admeasures to an extent of 5 cents situated at Surakkundu Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District on the basis of the representations dated 28.12.2020 and 04.08.2022 within a period stipulated time by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.